Finally: The Case Against Hamilton

I don’t think there’s a slight bit of hyperbole or exaggeration involved when I say that Hamilton, the awful musical that elitist millionaire New Yorkers are required by law to throw away thousands watching, that opened this week at the Pantages Theatre in Hollywood, represents everything that is wrong with America in 2017.

Allow me to make the case.

First, there’s the music. I’m admittedly not much of a hip-hop aficionado, but I know shit from Shinola. From my perspective, the art form has more or less been going downhill since Strictly Business (the EPMD record, not the Tommy Davidson vehicle), but there have been some highlights worth mentioning, mostly thanks to Ice Cube and an army of Wu bangers.

The point I’m trying to make is that, even to untrained ears such as mine, Hamilton is particularly bad. On the first take, I thought it sounded a bit like a UCLA freshman—the kind who only listens to “real hip-hop”—attempting his first mixtape.

But on second thought it’s closer to a local elementary school making a rap song for parents’ night. The latter description hints not merely at the simple, formulaic quality of the material, but also the cloying, bourgeois quality of it all.

From the reference to “ten-dollar Founding Father without a father” to “when the British taxed our tea we got frisky,” the whole affair sounds more like something made by precocious children than a professional composer.

We have Lin-Manuel Miranda to blame for this cultural atrocity, the scion of a psychologist and an advisor to New York Mayor Ed Koch, who attended the same elementary and high school as Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. Sure, he got bullied by Immortal Technique in school, but how much street cred is that worth?

After this, he attended Wesleyan University, a top-10-ranked school that costs $65,000 a year, according to Forbes, before making his mark writing jingles for noted prostitute-enthusiast Eliot Spitzer’s 2006 campaign. The original version of Hamilton debuted at a Vassar College workshop. All this is, of course, an attempt to firmly establish Miranda’s street cred, which is unassailable.

Some are irritated about the people who aren’t white playing white people, but I’m not. The whole production plays so fast and loose with the truth that it’s hard to pick any particular piece to criticize, there’s a reality correlation approximating that of the Weekly World News.

At the top of the list, though, has to be casting Alexander Hamilton as some proto-multicultural progressive. That’s either stupidity or mendacity, take your pick. Hamilton was, if anything, the most aristocratic of the Founding Fathers, the closest thing to a Colonial Tory. You know that electoral college everyone has been gnashing their teeth over for the last eight months? Guess whose idea that was?

Of course, shit music and feels-over-reals weren’t the whole problems with America in 2016—and they aren’t the biggest deal facing us in 2017, either.

No, the worst thing about this present moment in time is the elitist smugness with which zillionaires and their sycophants on the coasts piss all over anyone who does actual work for a living.

That’s not just one of the main reasons that Trump won the election. That attitude makes for garbage art.

Historically speaking, you’ve got high art and folk art, each with their own set of aesthetic guidelines and measuring sticks. What’s historically anomalous is commercial art—art that exists not due to the patronage of cultured elites or through the unrewarded efforts of the hoi polloi. It’s art that exists to make money.

Art that exists to make money isn’t a bad thing. A lot of the best music of the 20th century was commercial art. The Beatles are probably one of a handful of things anyone will remember about the 20th century in 500 years, a stunning example of commercial art as inspired genius.

What’s irritating, though, is when well-connected millionaires make art for the sake of signaling their moral superiority over the masses on the basis of their correct beliefs.

Hamilton has become a sort of avatar of the Lena Dunham Democratic Party against the rest of the world, perhaps best displayed by the cast lecturing Vice President Elect Mike Pence (the closest thing to a Wal-Mart greeter they’ll ever be in the same room as) about tolerance.

Tickets for Hamilton start between $179 and $199, with high-end tickets going for $849. Once they hit the secondary market (A.K.A. scalpers), you’re looking at between $650 and $1500 on StubHub to $2100 for orchestra seats at the Pantages Theatre in Hollywood where it opened this week.

Is this because it’s the best musical on Broadway?

Or is it because Hamilton is this season’s most fashionable way to signal liberal respectability and status among the One Percenters?

This isn’t speaking truth to power. This is power telling the rest of us what truth is. There’s nary a hint of self-awareness as those only vaguely aware of poverty and toil through a sociology textbook deign to lecture us little people about America’s “real values.” That’s what’s wrong with America in the current year.

The election of Donald Trump and the leave vote in the United Kingdom aren’t just political decisions. They’re a cultural revolt against the pomposity of upper-crust elitist liberals who don’t have to live with the consequences of their own values.

Hamilton is where the modern-day Marie Antoinettes tell unemployed forklift drivers to eat cake.

Off in the distance, the sans-cullotes are sharpening the guillotine. The aloof nobles are catching the latest performance of Hamilton having no idea they’re about to be cast—much against their will—in a bit part in Les Miserables.

One thought on “Finally: The Case Against Hamilton

  1. Hamilton what a waste of money. Sitting in that dreadful old Pantages movie house watching this crap and paying nearly $2,000 for two seats. I need to be committed. But I did get laid after this ordeal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *